Difference between revisions of "Compute differentially expressed genes (Agilent probes) (workflow)"

From BioUML platform
Jump to: navigation, search
(Automatic synchronization with BioUML)
 
(Automatic synchronization with BioUML)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Compute differentially expressed genes (Agilent probes)
 
:Compute differentially expressed genes (Agilent probes)
 
;Provider
 
;Provider
:[[GeneXplain GmbH]]
+
:[[geneXplain GmbH]]
 
== Workflow overview ==
 
== Workflow overview ==
 
[[File:Compute-differentially-expressed-genes-Agilent-probes-workflow-overview.png|400px]]
 
[[File:Compute-differentially-expressed-genes-Agilent-probes-workflow-overview.png|400px]]
 
== Description ==
 
== Description ==
This workflow is designed to identify upregulated, downregulated and non-changed genes for experimental data with three and more data points for each experiment and control. 
+
This workflow is designed to identify differentially expressed genes from an experiment data set compared to a control data set.  Normalized data with Affymetrix probeset IDs can be submitted as input. Such normalized files are the output of the workflow [http://test.genexplain.com/bioumlweb/#de=analyses/Methods/Data normalization/Normalize Agilent experiment and control Normalize Agilent experiment and control].
  
As input, the normalized data with Agilent probe IDs can be submitted.
+
In the first step, the up- and down-regulated probes are identified and log fold change values are calculated for all probes using the ''Up and Down Identification ''analysis. This analysis applies Student’s T-test and calculates p-values, thus the number of data points should be at least three for each experiment data set and control data set. A histogram with the log fold change distribution from the whole experiment is drawn and given output image file.
  
Such normalized files are resulting from the output of the “Normalize data” procedure under  “analyses/Methods/Data normalization/Normalize Agilent experiment and control”.
+
In addition the results are filtered by different conditions in parallel applying the ''Filter table'' method, to identify up-regulated, down-regulated, and non-changed Affymetrix probeset IDs. The filtering criteria are set as follows:
  
At the next step, p-value is calculated for up-and down-regulated Agilent probe IDs. This workflow applies Student T-test for p-value calculation, and therefore the number of data points should be at least three for each experiment and control.
+
'''For up-regulated probes: LogFoldChange>0.5 and -log_P_value_>3.
  
Simultaneously, log fold change is calculated for Agilent probeIDs, and as the result of this step, a table is produced in which both LogFoldChange and p-value are assigned to each row.
+
For down- regulated probes: LogFoldChange<-0.5 and -log_P_value_<-3.
  
Further, this table is filtered by several conditions in parallel, to identify upregulated, downregulated, and non-changed Agilent probe IDs.
+
For non-changed genes : LogFoldChange<0.002 and LogFoldChange>-0.002'''
  
The filtering criteria are set as the following.
+
The resulting tables of up-regulated, down-regulated, and non-changed Affymetrix probeset IDs are converted into a gene table with the ''Convert table'' method and annotated with additional information (gene descriptions, gene symbols, and species) via ''Annotate table'' method.  
  
For upregulated probes: LogFoldChange>0.5 and -log_P_value_>3.
+
A result folder is generated and automatically named corresponding to the experiment data set name. This resulting folder contains all tables, the histogramm and a summary HTML report.
 
+
For downregulated probes: LogFoldChange<-0.5 and -log_P_value_<-3.
+
 
+
For non-changed probes: LogFoldChange<0.01 and LogFoldChange>-0.01
+
 
+
Resulting tables of the upregulated, downregulated, and non-changed Agilent probe IDs are annotated with additional information, gene description, gene symbols, species.
+
 
+
Finally, these tables are converted into the tables of genes. Two tables are produced, with Ensembl Gene IDs and with Entrez IDs.
+
  
 
== Parameters ==
 
== Parameters ==
Line 37: Line 29:
  
 
[[Category:Workflows]]
 
[[Category:Workflows]]
 +
[[Category:GeneXplain workflows]]
 
[[Category:Autogenerated pages]]
 
[[Category:Autogenerated pages]]

Latest revision as of 16:34, 12 March 2019

Workflow title
Compute differentially expressed genes (Agilent probes)
Provider
geneXplain GmbH

[edit] Workflow overview

Compute-differentially-expressed-genes-Agilent-probes-workflow-overview.png

[edit] Description

This workflow is designed to identify differentially expressed genes from an experiment data set compared to a control data set.  Normalized data with Affymetrix probeset IDs can be submitted as input. Such normalized files are the output of the workflow normalization/Normalize Agilent experiment and control Normalize Agilent experiment and control.

In the first step, the up- and down-regulated probes are identified and log fold change values are calculated for all probes using the Up and Down Identification analysis. This analysis applies Student’s T-test and calculates p-values, thus the number of data points should be at least three for each experiment data set and control data set. A histogram with the log fold change distribution from the whole experiment is drawn and given output image file.

In addition the results are filtered by different conditions in parallel applying the Filter table method, to identify up-regulated, down-regulated, and non-changed Affymetrix probeset IDs. The filtering criteria are set as follows:

For up-regulated probes: LogFoldChange>0.5 and -log_P_value_>3.

For down- regulated probes: LogFoldChange<-0.5 and -log_P_value_<-3.

For non-changed genes : LogFoldChange<0.002 and LogFoldChange>-0.002

The resulting tables of up-regulated, down-regulated, and non-changed Affymetrix probeset IDs are converted into a gene table with the Convert table method and annotated with additional information (gene descriptions, gene symbols, and species) via Annotate table method.

A result folder is generated and automatically named corresponding to the experiment data set name. This resulting folder contains all tables, the histogramm and a summary HTML report.

[edit] Parameters

Experiment normalized
Control normalized
Species
Results folder
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
BioUML platform
Community
Modelling
Analysis & Workflows
Collaborative research
Development
Virtual biology
Wiki
Toolbox