Difference between revisions of "Tools Comparison 2022"
From BioUML platform
Ilya Kiselev (Talk | contribs) |
Ilya Kiselev (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| + | | + | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |5. Modular modeling | + | |5. Flux balance |
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |6. Modular modeling | ||
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 108: | Line 116: | ||
| + | | + | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |7. Mixed formalisms |
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 116: | Line 124: | ||
| + | | + | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |8. Agent-based |
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 124: | Line 132: | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |9. Rule-based |
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 132: | Line 140: | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |10. Population-based |
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 181: | Line 189: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Combine archive | |5. Combine archive | ||
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|6. SBOL | |6. SBOL | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 7 February 2022
Here we collect information about similar software and their features in comparison with BioUML.
This comparison was made in February 2022. Previous was done in 2019 and is available at separate page Tools Comparison.
| BioUML | COPASI | iBioSim | CellDesigner | Tellurium | Morpheus | |
| Capabilities | ||||||
| 1. Model creation | visual\text-based | via tables | visual | visual | text-based | via tables |
| 2. Simulation | + | + | + | via ext.tools | + | + |
| 3. Parameter fitting | + | + | - | - | - | - |
| 4. Model analysis | + | + | + | - | + | + |
| 5. Database access | + | - | + | + | - | - |
| Formalism | ||||||
| 1. ODE | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 2. Stochastic Gillespie-type | + | + | - | + | + | + |
| 3. Algebraic | + | - | + | - | + | + |
| 4. Discrete | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 5. Flux balance | ||||||
| 6. Modular modeling | + | - | + | - | + | + |
| 7. Mixed formalisms | + | - | - | - | - | + |
| 8. Agent-based | + | - | + | - | - | - |
| 9. Rule-based | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10. Population-based | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| Standards | ||||||
| 1. SBML | l3v2, all tests passed | l3v1 except algebraic | l3v1 | l3v1 | l3v1 | l3v1, partially |
| 2. SBML comp | fully, all tests passed | - | partially | - | partially | partially |
| 3. SBGN | + | export | - | + | - | - |
| 4. SedML | + | - | - | - | + | - |
| 5. Combine archive | ||||||
| 6. SBOL | - | - | + | - | - | - |
| 7. Antimony | + (in standalone) | - | - | - | + | - |
| 8. Bionetgen | + (in standalone) | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9. BioPAX | + | - | - | + | - | - |
| Availability | ||||||
| 1. Windows | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 2. Linux | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 3. MacOS | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 4. Web application | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| Programming Language | Java | C++ | Java | Java | Python | C++ |
